An Absent-Minded Badger



Edition 525

Morning, it’s Monday 16th February.

Housekeeping from last week. 
The votes are in for what you’d all do in this situation…

“A journalist from a national newspaper has asked for an interview on a topic I know well. I’ve read their coverage and the framing often feels selective, sometimes sensational, and never aligned with how I’d explain the issue. That said, the paper reaches people I rarely get access to.”

I’ve told a version of this story in a previous Briefing, but it’s relevant to the choice that I would make in that situation…



Monday: Covid-19 inquiry: Module 10 hearings begin


Tuesday: UK Labour Market Statistics


Wednesday: California social media addiction lawsuit: trial continues; Mark Zuckerberg testimony possible


Thursday: Global Summit on Artificial Intelligence: India hosts heads of state summit

Trump-led Board of Peace – inaugural meeting



Friday: Paramount hostile bid for Warner Bros. Discovery – latest shareholders deadline



Sunday: The BAFTAS

You The Editor

Go back to last Monday. Imagine you’re the editor of the BBC 6.

The news the King will “stand ready to support” the police over allegations regarding his brother breaks just before you go to air. All day there has been a febrile atmosphere in Westminster – at midday Anas Sarwar called on the PM to go.

What is your lead?

An entertaining profile of the BBC’s Jeremy Bowen in this weekend’s FT:

I loved the section on Bowen’s disastrous stint as presenter on BBC Breakfast, which he hated doing. Writer Henry Mance quotes a reviewer at the time who likened his style to “an absent-minded badger who’s eaten his earpiece.” 
Killer line.

A reader takes me to task following last week’s Bezos rant:

I was very surprised by your coverage of the Washington Post layoffs.

The fact of the matter is that that newspaper has been burning money for years, and as far as I can tell, literally no one in the editorial team (800 staff? my goodness, what have they been doing?) proposed a plan to reform their coverage to actually serve what their readers want. It seems to me that they were just a bunch of petulant and entitled children who wanted the rich guy to keep giving them money to write increasingly irrelevant nonsense.

Bezos shouldn’t be criticised for belatedly trying to align the newspaper to a plausible theory of what customers want. He should be thanked by the “editorial staff” for burning hundreds of millions of dollars to keep them highly paid for many years, even if that money is now ending. The guy who belatedly tells the truth that customers weren’t paying for their newspaper isn’t the bad guy, the bad guy here are the editorial leaders who failed to even try to turn the ship around from the world’s most obvious shipwreck.

Final thoughts anyone before we put this one to bed?

Footnotes: 

DG Tim Davie says t
he BBC World Service will run out of funding in just seven weeks with no future deal with the government currently in place.

On This Day: Ministry of Defence assistant secretary Clive Ponting resigned from his post over the Belgrano affair on this day in 1985. (Scandals felt more gentle in those days.)

We’re in Milton Keynes and London this week.

The Mutt Photo: 

Be part of the MMB. Thoughts on this week’s content, or interviews you’ve seen, heard, or (best of all) done, please let us know.

Back next Monday. Have a super week.

All at Inside Edge

LinkedIn  Twitter

Inside Edge Training | The Centre, 201-203 London Road | East Grinstead , RH19 1HA GB